This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
dvi manual failure
- To: libc-alpha at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- Subject: dvi manual failure
- From: Bruno Haible <haible at ilog dot fr>
- Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 15:37:27 +0200 (MET DST)
In glibc-2000-04-28, "make dvi" fails in arith.texi as follows:
! Missing number, treated as zero.
<to be read again>
}
@item ...t @hbox to 0pt{@hss @itemcontents @hskip
@itemmargin }@vadjust {@pe...
l.55 @item
int8_t
Here is a fix.
2000-04-29 Bruno Haible <haible@clisp.cons.org>
* manual/arith.texi: Remove @w from @itemize.
*** manual/arith.texi.bak Fri Apr 28 12:38:38 2000
--- manual/arith.texi Sun Apr 30 00:47:40 2000
***************
*** 51,57 ****
If you require that an integer be represented in exactly N bits, use one
of the following types, with the obvious mapping to bit size and signedness:
! @itemize @w
@item int8_t
@item int16_t
@item int32_t
--- 51,57 ----
If you require that an integer be represented in exactly N bits, use one
of the following types, with the obvious mapping to bit size and signedness:
! @itemize
@item int8_t
@item int16_t
@item int32_t
***************
*** 68,74 ****
If you don't need a specific storage size, but want the smallest data
structure with @emph{at least} N bits, use one of these:
! @itemize @w
@item int8_least_t
@item int16_least_t
@item int32_least_t
--- 68,74 ----
If you don't need a specific storage size, but want the smallest data
structure with @emph{at least} N bits, use one of these:
! @itemize
@item int8_least_t
@item int16_least_t
@item int32_least_t
***************
*** 84,90 ****
among data structures with the same access speed, the smallest one), use
one of these:
! @itemize @w
@item int8_fast_t
@item int16_fast_t
@item int32_fast_t
--- 84,90 ----
among data structures with the same access speed, the smallest one), use
one of these:
! @itemize
@item int8_fast_t
@item int16_fast_t
@item int32_fast_t
***************
*** 100,106 ****
you should write code that takes into account the variable size and range
of the integer.
! @itemize @w
@item intmax_t
@item uintmax_t
@end itemize
--- 100,106 ----
you should write code that takes into account the variable size and range
of the integer.
! @itemize
@item intmax_t
@item uintmax_t
@end itemize