This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: GCC 2.95.2 and GLIBC 2.1.93, broken streambuf.h


Rod Stewart <stewart@lab43.org> writes in libc-alpha@sourceware.cygnus.com:

 ...
> The mainline CVS is the head (weekly snapshots) of the CVS tree.

O.K.

I am using this:
$ gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/alpha-pc-linux/2.96/specs
gcc version 2.96 20000828 (experimental)

as the main compiler.  I haven't been taking direct CVS snapshots
(like I'm doing with glibc) because the weekly tarballs come out fast
enough for me.  I did indeed get gcc-2.95.2 and egcs-1.1.2 to compile
with glibc-2.2 installed by backporting the changes I found there.

I am now very confused.  What did Ulrich mean when he asked me to use
a different compiler?  The gcc-2.96 branch is not particularly stable
so I thought he meant to use one of the other branches.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]