This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: glibc 2.1.93
- To: Geoff Keating <geoffk at cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: glibc 2.1.93
- From: Christian Iseli <chris at ludwig-alpha dot unil dot ch>
- Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 14:29:59 +0200
- cc: aj at suse dot de, libc-alpha at sourceware dot cygnus dot com, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
Hi folks,
geoffk@cygnus.com said:
> This is OK, because the output from the compiler is fed directly into
> the assembler; there's no preprocessor in the way.
Ok, things look brighter today. With current GCC CVS (20000920), and current
libc CVS, I have:
$ make -k check >& check.log
$ grep '\*\*' check.log
make[2]: *** [/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/glibc-build-i386/localedata/tst-locale.out]
Error 139
make[1]: *** [localedata/tests] Error 2
make[2]: *** [/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/glibc-build-i386/debug/backtrace-tst.out]
Error 139
make[1]: *** [debug/tests] Error 2
make: *** [check] Error 2
Strangely enough, the content of tst-locale.out is:
locale de_DE.437 generated succesfully
locale test1 generated succesfully
locale test2 generated succesfully
locale test3 generated succesfully
locale test4 generated succesfully
backtrace-tst.out is empty (zero length).
Oh, BTW, I had to slightly patch GCC to get java (of all things) to compile:
--- gcc/gcc/java/jcf-parse.c.chris Wed Sep 20 11:14:05 2000
+++ gcc/gcc/java/jcf-parse.c Wed Sep 20 11:14:50 2000
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ The Free Software Foundation is independ
/* Written by Per Bothner <bothner@cygnus.com> */
+#define _XOPEN_SOURCE
#include "config.h"
#include "system.h"
#include "tree.h"
--- gcc/gcc/java/jv-scan.c.chris Wed Sep 20 11:14:14 2000
+++ gcc/gcc/java/jv-scan.c Wed Sep 20 11:14:43 2000
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ along with GNU CC; see the file COPYING.
the Free Software Foundation, 59 Temple Place - Suite 330,
Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA. */
+#define _XOPEN_SOURCE
#include "config.h"
#include "system.h"
This is due to the fact that those files use CODESET, which seems to only be
defined for XOPEN ... So I cross-post this to gcc-bugs, just in case.
Cheers,
Christian