This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: inconsistentcy in features.h

To: drepper at cygnus dot com (Ulrich Drepper)
Subject: Re: inconsistentcy in features.h
From: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
Date: 29 Sep 2000 08:06:28 +0200
Cc: Markus Kuhn <Markus dot Kuhn at cl dot cam dot ac dot uk>,libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
References: <E13biWM-0001Bj-00@wisbech.cl.cam.ac.uk><m3lmwb21dz.fsf@otr.mynet.cygnus.com>

>>>>> Ulrich Drepper writes:

 > Markus Kuhn <Markus.Kuhn@cl.cam.ac.uk> writes:
>> The last sentence seems to be wrong. What actually happens when none of
>> these are defined is merely:

 > It used to be correct (in the early days).  I've rewritten this part
 > of the comment now.

Can you check manual/creature.texi also?  It seems that it doesn't
mention this case at all.

Thanks,
Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger
  SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
   private aj@arthur.inka.de
    http://www.suse.de/~aj

Follow-Ups:
- Re: inconsistentcy in features.h
  - From: Ulrich Drepper

References:
- inconsistentcy in features.h
  - From: Markus Kuhn
- Re: inconsistentcy in features.h
  - From: Ulrich Drepper

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]