This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
FAQ table of contents tweak
- To: libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
- Subject: FAQ table of contents tweak
- From: Bruno Haible <haible at ilog dot fr>
- Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 16:24:40 +0100 (CET)
The FAQ table of contents contain spurious entries of the form
"Removed. Does not apply anymore." which disturb the general layout
of the table of contents. Here is a fix to make them disappear from
the TOC.
Bruno
*** glibc-cvs/FAQ.in.bak Wed Nov 1 15:02:47 2000
--- glibc-cvs/FAQ.in Fri Nov 3 16:12:49 2000
***************
*** 487,493 ****
libc anymore?
! Removed. Does not apply anymore.
?? When I use GNU libc on my Linux system by linking against
the libc.so which comes with glibc all I get is a core dump.
--- 487,493 ----
libc anymore?
! {} Removed. Does not apply anymore.
?? When I use GNU libc on my Linux system by linking against
the libc.so which comes with glibc all I get is a core dump.
***************
*** 1321,1327 ****
the Perl db modules the testsuite is not passed. This did not
happen with db-1, gdbm, or ndbm.
! Removed. Does not apply anymore.
?? The pow() inline function I get when including <math.h> is broken.
I get segmentation faults when I run the program.
--- 1334,1340 ----
the Perl db modules the testsuite is not passed. This did not
happen with db-1, gdbm, or ndbm.
! {} Removed. Does not apply anymore.
?? The pow() inline function I get when including <math.h> is broken.
I get segmentation faults when I run the program.
***************
*** 1413,1419 ****
?? Programs compiled with glibc 2.1 can't read db files made with glibc
2.0. What has changed that programs like rpm break?
! Removed. Does not apply anymore.
?? Autoconf's AC_CHECK_FUNC macro reports that a function exists, but
when I try to use it, it always returns -1 and sets errno to ENOSYS.
--- 1426,1432 ----
?? Programs compiled with glibc 2.1 can't read db files made with glibc
2.0. What has changed that programs like rpm break?
! {} Removed. Does not apply anymore.
?? Autoconf's AC_CHECK_FUNC macro reports that a function exists, but
when I try to use it, it always returns -1 and sets errno to ENOSYS.
***************
*** 1525,1531 ****
??make I've build make 3.77 against glibc 2.1 and now make gets
segmentation faults.
! Removed. Does not apply anymore, use make 3.79 or newer.
?? Why do so many programs using math functions fail on my AlphaStation?
--- 1538,1544 ----
??make I've build make 3.77 against glibc 2.1 and now make gets
segmentation faults.
! {} Removed. Does not apply anymore, use make 3.79 or newer.
?? Why do so many programs using math functions fail on my AlphaStation?