This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: CLK_TCK


Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> writes:

> Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> writes:
> 
> > sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/bits/time.h uses:
> > 
> > #  if !defined __STRICT_ANSI__ && !defined __USE_XOPEN2K
> > /* Even though CLOCKS_PER_SEC has such a strange value CLK_TCK
> >    presents the real value for clock ticks per second for the system.  */
> > #   include <bits/types.h>
> > extern long int __sysconf (int);
> > #   define CLK_TCK ((__clock_t) __sysconf (2))  /* 2 is _SC_CLK_TCK */
> > #  endif
> > 
> > and time/time.h has:
> > # if defined __USE_POSIX && !defined __USE_XOPEN2K
> > #  ifndef CLK_TCK
> > #   define CLK_TCK      CLOCKS_PER_SEC
> > #  endif
> > # endif
> > 
> > Why do we have both definitions?
> 
> Not all <bits/time.h> files define CLK_TCK.

I see - but then both headers should use the same #ifdef.  We
shouldn't use __STRICT_ANSI__ in one and __USE_POSIX in the other place.

> > With -D_GNU_SOURCE you don't get any at all since _GNU_SOURCE implies
> > __USE_XOPEN2K:
> 
> And this is fine.  CLK_TCK shouldn't be used.  It has been removed
> from the standard.

Shouldn't we leave it in for _GNU_SOURCE ?  Otherwise we break a
number of programs :-(

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger
  SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
   private aj@arthur.inka.de
    http://www.suse.de/~aj

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]