This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [Uwe Moeller <umr@interlogic.de>] libc/2215: mcheck(): free() reports "invalid pointer" while pointer looks ok
- To: drepper at cygnus dot com
- Subject: Re: [Uwe Moeller <umr@interlogic.de>] libc/2215: mcheck(): free() reports "invalid pointer" while pointer looks ok
- From: Wolfram Gloger <Wolfram dot Gloger at dent dot med dot uni-muenchen dot de>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 16:19:55 +0200 (MDT)
- CC: libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com, umr at interlogic dot de
- References: <holmoonnb7.fsf@gee.suse.de> <m3g0evg691.fsf@otr.mynet.cygnus.com>
Hello,
> I've a change for this which I'm testing in this moment. The problem
> is that the hooks are overwritten before malloc had the chance to
> install it's own wrappers.
OK thanks -- I think one set of hooks should take precedence, if the
hooks have already been set by mcheck then MALLOC_CHECK_ shouldn't try
to re-set them.
Regards,
Wolfram.