This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: libgcc_s.so.1 ASIS won't work with glibc.

To: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Subject: Re: libgcc_s.so.1 ASIS won't work with glibc.
From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 09:51:55 -0700
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
References: <20010630162231.A18131@lucon.org> <Pine.LNX.4.30.0106301526270.318-100000@straylight.int.sonicity.com> <20010701120217.F737@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <20010702124538.A30082@lucon.org> <20010702154850.N32061@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20010702125740.A30325@lucon.org> <20010702173640.A2642@lucon.org>

On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 05:36:40PM -0700, H . J . Lu wrote:
> I don't believe it will ever work since __register_frame,
> __register_frame_table, __register_frame_info_table and
> __register_frame_info have different ABIs in libgcc_s.so.1 and
> libc.so.6.

Why do you say this?  I don't believe it's true.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: libgcc_s.so.1 ASIS won't work with glibc.
  - From: H . J . Lu

References:
- Re: GCC vs GLIBC: why this stance, Drepper ?!?
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- PATCH: Re: GCC vs GLIBC: why this stance, Drepper ?!?
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: PATCH: Re: GCC vs GLIBC: why this stance, Drepper ?!?
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: PATCH: Re: GCC vs GLIBC: why this stance, Drepper ?!?
  - From: H . J . Lu
- libgcc_s.so.1 ASIS won't work with glibc.
  - From: H . J . Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]