This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH] Re: Changed shared library loading strategy on PPC, why?
- To: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: Changed shared library loading strategy on PPC, why?
- From: Franz Sirl <Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 13:39:02 +0200
- Cc: Olaf Hering <olh at suse dot de>,Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>,Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>,libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
- References: <20010724211720.A30363@suse.de><5.1.0.14.2.20010618101149.0368aec8@mail.lauterbach.com><20010622131502.A2811@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz><hou202xt5y.fsf@gee.suse.de><20010724211720.A30363@suse.de>
At 08:34 25.07.2001, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>Olaf Hering <olh@suse.de> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 24, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> >
> >> Btw. Olaf is running a complete build of glibc and will tell the
> >> results later, but I'm convinced that this fixes the problems we
> >> encountered.
> >
> > I did a fresh build of binutils , glibc and rpm with the patch applied
> > and it works now.
>
>Since Geoff said previously for both patches:
>
> > Anyway, all the patches look fine to me. It's only a heuristic,
> > it's known to break for various reasons, the important thing is that
> > it works most of the time.
>
>I'm going to commit this now since this version works better,
Thanks. Is there a way to create a testcase for static binaries accessing a
shared lib?
Franz.