This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
> Then either make the memory variable (like __malloc_hook) volatile, or use > the asm ("" : "=r" (hook) : "0" (hook)); trick. The latter is cheaper. OK, fine, will you prepare a patch with the latter? You know gcc well, will this really make a difference, and if so, on which architectures? Regards, Wolfram.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |