This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: malloc patch for 2.2.4

To: drepper at cygnus dot com
Subject: Re: malloc patch for 2.2.4
From: Wolfram Gloger <Wolfram dot Gloger at dent dot med dot uni-muenchen dot de>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 11:08:26 +0200 (MDT)
CC: libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
References: <20010821155519.30276.qmail@md.dent.med.uni-muenchen.de><m3pu9p5omb.fsf@otr.mynet><200108220854.KAA69220@max.zk-i.med.uni-muenchen.de><je66bgo1g2.fsf@sykes.suse.de><200108221105.NAA64372@max.zk-i.med.uni-muenchen.de><20010822132226.F619@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz><200108221203.OAA84517@max.zk-i.med.uni-muenchen.de><200108222004.NAA17956@geoffk.org><200108231220.OAA66582@max.zk-i.med.uni-muenchen.de><200108231840.LAA19009@geoffk.org><200108271408.QAA93732@max.zk-i.med.uni-muenchen.de> <m3pu9e78a8.fsf@otr.mynet>

> If this isn't changing anything it's not worth applying.  It just
> hides the fact that no problem has been identified and fixed.

I kind of agree, which is why my initial patch didn't have volatile.

Regards,
Wolfram.

References:
- malloc patch for 2.2.4
  - From: Wolfram Gloger
- Re: malloc patch for 2.2.4
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: malloc patch for 2.2.4
  - From: Wolfram Gloger
- Re: malloc patch for 2.2.4
  - From: Andreas Schwab
- Re: malloc patch for 2.2.4
  - From: Wolfram Gloger
- Re: malloc patch for 2.2.4
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: malloc patch for 2.2.4
  - From: Wolfram Gloger
- Re: malloc patch for 2.2.4
  - From: Geoff Keating
- Re: malloc patch for 2.2.4
  - From: Wolfram Gloger
- Re: malloc patch for 2.2.4
  - From: Geoff Keating
- Re: malloc patch for 2.2.4
  - From: Wolfram Gloger
- Re: malloc patch for 2.2.4
  - From: Ulrich Drepper

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]