This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: 2 problems with sprof

To: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Subject: Re: 2 problems with sprof
From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
Date: 22 Sep 2001 19:10:19 -0700
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
References: <20010919190222.A7525@lucon.org> <m34rpyiosf.fsf@myware.mynet><20010919215047.A9999@lucon.org> <m3wv2uh2dk.fsf@myware.mynet><20010920001400.A12094@lucon.org> <m3n13qgwfg.fsf@myware.mynet><20010920080757.B18774@lucon.org> <20010920171046.A26696@lucon.org>
Reply-To: drepper at cygnus dot com (Ulrich Drepper)

"H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> writes:

> sprof is a very special case. I don't think RTLD_UNDEF_OK is appropriate
> here. Also it doesn't have to deal with DT_INIT/DT_FINI/DT_NEEDED. This
> patch has minimum impact on performance.

I can go with that.  But the flag shouldn't be exported.  Please look
at the changes I checked in.  Thanks,

-- 
---------------.                          ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat          `--' drepper at redhat.com   `------------------------

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2 problems with sprof
  - From: H . J . Lu

References:
- 2 problems with sprof
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: 2 problems with sprof
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: 2 problems with sprof
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: 2 problems with sprof
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: 2 problems with sprof
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: 2 problems with sprof
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: 2 problems with sprof
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: 2 problems with sprof
  - From: H . J . Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]