This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [patch] errno.texi: Clarify some GNU extensions
- From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
- To: Ben Collins <bcollins at debian dot org>
- Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
- Date: 28 Nov 2001 17:04:17 -0800
- Subject: Re: [patch] errno.texi: Clarify some GNU extensions
- References: <20011024115713.F10952@visi.net> <m38zcqwi0r.fsf@myware.mynet><20011128192151.B7151@visi.net>
- Reply-to: drepper at redhat dot com (Ulrich Drepper)
Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org> writes:
> Then why not follow the rest of the documentation and label the spec
> (like is done for BSD, SYSV, POSIX, etc.)? Does it really hurt to be
> more clear, especially in the section that actually documents this
> interface? And shouldn't examples be particularly clear?
I'm sick of having to defend every decision for you. Your patch would
create unnecessary inconsistencies. Everything is already said.
--
---------------. ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `------------------------