This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [patch] errno.texi: Clarify some GNU extensions
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 05:04:17PM -0800, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org> writes:
>
> > Then why not follow the rest of the documentation and label the spec
> > (like is done for BSD, SYSV, POSIX, etc.)? Does it really hurt to be
> > more clear, especially in the section that actually documents this
> > interface? And shouldn't examples be particularly clear?
>
> I'm sick of having to defend every decision for you. Your patch would
> create unnecessary inconsistencies. Everything is already said.
My mistake, I forgot who I was conversing with.
--
.----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=-----.
/ Ben Collins -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` bcollins@debian.org -- bcollins@openldap.org -- bcollins@linux.com '
`---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'