This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [libc-alpha] Re: [open-source] Re: Wish for 2002
- From: "Martin v. Loewis" <martin at v dot loewis dot de>
- To: torvalds at transmeta dot com
- Cc: tb at becket dot net, roland at frob dot com, kaz at ashi dot footprints dot net, rra at stanford dot edu, libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 08:35:53 +0100
- Subject: Re: [libc-alpha] Re: [open-source] Re: Wish for 2002
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201091742460.1109-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>
> So the arguments _for_ adding to it have to be damn strong. I don't think
> they have been so far.
Exactly. An International Standard mandating presence of additional
functions is normally considered a strong-enough argument. The next
revision of C might happen 2009 or so, so until then, we're safe :-)
Regards,
Martin