Re: gcc 3.1 20020118 miscompiled ld.so on Linux/mips

[Rene Rebe <rene dot rebe at gmx dot net>]

Moin.

From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
Subject: Re: gcc 3.1 20020118 miscompiled ld.so on Linux/mips
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 21:16:00 -0800

> On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 01:25:21AM +0100, Rene Rebe wrote:
> > From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
> > Subject: gcc 3.1 20020118 miscompiled ld.so on Linux/mips
> > Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 11:39:45 -0800
> > 
> > > When I used gcc 3.1 20020118 to compile the current glibc from trunk
> > > on Linux/mips, I got
> > > 
> > > # /export/build/gnu/glibc-3.1/build-mipsel-linux/elf/ld.so.1
> > > zsh: 30232 segmentation fault (core dumped) /export/build/gnu/glibc-3.1/build-mipsel-linux/elf/ld.so.1
> > 
> > I got exaclty the same for i386 using the gcc-3.0.3 on a system
> > running still the glibc-2.1.3 a few days ago. - Should this
> > combination work?
> 
> I don't think so. But I could be wrong.

Since it wasn't in the release Mail - what version of the glibc is
required to compile the glibc-2.2.5? How should the gcc-3.0.3 be set
up to get the glibc-2.2.5 compiled?

And why do you think a glibc-2.1.3 can not compile the glibc-2.2.5
(What kind of magic system can then compile it?)

Much thanks!

> H.J.

k33p h4ck1n6
  René

-- 
René Rebe (Registered Linux user: #248718 <http://counter.li.org>)

eMail:    rene.rebe@gmx.net
          rene@rocklinux.org

Homepage: http://drocklinux.dyndns.org/rene/

Anyone sending unwanted advertising e-mail to this address will be
charged $25 for network traffic and computing time. By extracting my
address from this message or its header, you agree to these terms.