This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: gcc 3.1 20020118 miscompiled ld.so on Linux/mips


Rene Rebe <rene.rebe@gmx.net> writes:

> Moin.
>
> From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
> Subject: Re: gcc 3.1 20020118 miscompiled ld.so on Linux/mips
> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 21:16:00 -0800
>
[...]
>> > I got exaclty the same for i386 using the gcc-3.0.3 on a system
>> > running still the glibc-2.1.3 a few days ago. - Should this
>> > combination work?
>> 
>> I don't think so. But I could be wrong.
>
> Since it wasn't in the release Mail - what version of the glibc is
> required to compile the glibc-2.2.5? How should the gcc-3.0.3 be set
> up to get the glibc-2.2.5 compiled?

gcc 2.95.3 plus some extra patches, gcc 3.0.3, or anything newer
should be fine.

> And why do you think a glibc-2.1.3 can not compile the glibc-2.2.5
> (What kind of magic system can then compile it?)

gcc 3 will not work with any glibc release prior to 2.2.5.

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger
  SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
   private aj@arthur.inka.de
    http://www.suse.de/~aj


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]