This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: The relative timeout in linuxthreads
- From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
- To: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: 06 Feb 2002 15:36:03 -0800
- Subject: Re: The relative timeout in linuxthreads
- References: <20020206152641.A31597@lucon.org>
- Reply-to: drepper at redhat dot com (Ulrich Drepper)
"H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> writes:
> I will add a new interface to support the timeout value in relative
> time to solve our problems. Does anyone have any other suggestions?
Get the needed support in the kernel to handle clocks, absolute
timeouts etc.. Adding new interfaces is not an option. The
discussions of the POSIX working will probably contain an explanation
why this is a bad idea. In any case it would just encourage
incompatibilities which are only caused by the mostly terrible support
for RT POSIX features in the Linux kernel.
--
---------------. ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `------------------------