This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Tue, 2002-04-09 at 13:18, Thorsten Kukuk wrote: > Why do we have a major version number for it and increased it in the > past for binary incopatible changes? Why is this called "libnss*" and > not "nss*" like Solaris does? Because of the build process. That's even documented somewhere. > The reason (you self explained it!) is, > that in this way it is possible to link against this libraries. Why > did you change your opinium about this? Not from the outside. These are clearly internal interfaces. > Yes, and the result is that you are not able to support NIS+ with it. OK, then find another way. But don't use internal symbols. Stop arguing and fix your code. -- ---------------. ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `------------------------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |