This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [wiget@pld.org.pl] libc/3237: symbol __udivdi3, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference
- From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- To: Franz Sirl <Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com>
- Cc: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>, libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com, wiget at pld dot org dot pl
- Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 12:44:27 -0400
- Subject: Re: [wiget@pld.org.pl] libc/3237: symbol __udivdi3, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference
- References: <u8sn66uki0.fsf@gromit.moeb> <20020408214129.X32482@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <200204121841.15205@enzo.bigblue.local>
- Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 06:41:15PM +0200, Franz Sirl wrote:
> On Monday 08 April 2002 21:41, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 08:13:11PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> > > Hi glibc developers,
> > >
> > > can somebody look into this, please?
> >
> > I'd assume glibc-2-2-branch >= 2002-02-28 was not used, since this
> > really shouldn't happen there.
> > Before sysdeps/wordsize-32/divdi3.c was added, this could happen, e.g.
> > if gcc wouldn't use __udivdi3 internally at all for the whole libc.so,
> > then it wouldn't be added to link and thus wouldn't be exported (I
> > believe).
>
> The same just happened to me, I guess this means I have to add divdi3.c to
> sysdeps/powerpc/Makefile?
powerpc was never exporting __udivdi3 from glibc AFAIK (at least it is not
in Versions I've checked).
So you need to give us more details on what exactly happened.
Jakub