This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: libc error
On Mon, Aug 05, 2002 at 04:50:09PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> bemis <bemis@iol.unh.edu> writes:
>
> > Hello Adreas,
> > Thanks for the clarification. I attached todays test-float.out file. Todays build with
> > the baseline basic-gcc_2.95.3 on an alphaev56 system. We are getting the same errors as
> > before in files : test-float.out, test-double.out, test-ifloat.out, test-idouble.out.
> > If these aren't going to fixed for glibc2.2 please let us know.
> > I heard you asked for our memory/swap space. I cat'ed our /proc/meminfo file while we were
> > building a couple of packages:
> > total: used: free: shared: buffers: cached:
> > Mem: 4219084800 4206059520 13025280 0 314195968 3115606016
> > Swap: 9097109504 10854400 9086255104
> > MemTotal: 4120200 kB
> > MemFree: 12720 kB
> > MemShared: 0 kB
> > Buffers: 306832 kB
> > Cached: 3040144 kB
> > SwapCached: 2440 kB
> > Active: 2266504 kB
> > Inactive: 1312656 kB
> > HighTotal: 0 kB
> > HighFree: 0 kB
> > LowTotal: 4120200 kB
> > LowFree: 12720 kB
> > SwapTotal: 8883896 kB
> > SwapFree: 8873296 kB
> >
> > thanks again.
> > Matt Bemis
>
> That looks like you really might not have enough space for some of the
> tests - but check yourself while running the test that failed.
Might not have enough space? After buffers/cache, they have something
like three gigabytes of free RAM and nine gigabytes of free swap space.
>
> Looking over the *.out files, those errors are really small. They
> will not get fixed in the glibc 2.2 timeframe. But results for glibc
> 2.3 are welcome - for glibc 2.3 some of the tests have been rewritten
> and enhanced so that we should get less errors.
>
> Andreas
> --
> Andreas Jaeger
> SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
> private aj@arthur.inka.de
> http://www.suse.de/~aj
>
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer