This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Results with glibc-2.2.92


On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Ulrich Drepper wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jeff Chua wrote:
>
> > So, why does the gcc/glib not default to "strip" during installation?
> > Most people don't bother with these files after install.
>
> The extra size doesn't add a bit to the runtime costs.  But the debug
> info is invaluable when you need it.  If you then strip the binaries it
> is too late.

I ran into a problem trying to build a minimum filesystem using
initrd/ramdisk and realized that the bin and lib are too big to fit into
initrd ... there seems to be a limitation of <4MB for celeron and <8M for
pentium to boot, so stripping these files make it easier to fit the
necessary tools into the limited fs.

Thanks,
Jeff



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]