This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Miscompilation of glibc with CVS mainline
- From: prj at po dot cwru dot edu (Paul Jarc)
- To: "John David Anglin" <dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 13:58:36 -0500
- Subject: Re: Miscompilation of glibc with CVS mainline
- Organization: What did you have in mind? A short, blunt, human pyramid?
- References: <200301021851.h02Ipmek011007@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>
"John David Anglin" <dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> wrote:
> I can't seem to find where the standard says &weak_func is always
> unequal to null.
n869 6.3.2.3p3: "[...] the resulting pointer, called a null pointer,
is guaranteed to compare unequal to a pointer to any object or
function."
paul