This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: is sysdep-cancel.h needed for any linux arch?

From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
To: Franz Sirl <Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2003 21:47:52 -0800
Subject: Re: is sysdep-cancel.h needed for any linux arch?
Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
References: <20030102151735.GH628@bogon.ms20.nix> <200301040055.35324@enzo.bigblue.local> <20030104010120.G6196@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <200301040638.57935@enzo.bigblue.local>

Franz Sirl wrote:

> So, my initial version seems to work in the pthread case, but in the libc case 
> it crashes in __libc_enable_asynccancel while calling  
> (*__libc_pthread_functions.ptr_pthread_thread_self)() which is zero. As this 
> happens still during library init, who is responsible for initing the 
> __libc_pthread_functions struct with the proper values?

See linuxthreads/libc_pthread_init.c.  The function gets the array
passed in and it makes a copy.

-- 
--------------.                        ,-.            444 Castro Street
Ulrich Drepper \    ,-----------------'   \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA
Red Hat         `--' drepper at redhat.com `---------------------------

Follow-Ups:
- Re: is sysdep-cancel.h needed for any linux arch?
  - From: Franz Sirl

References:
- is sysdep-cancel.h needed for any linux arch?
  - From: Guido Guenther
- Re: is sysdep-cancel.h needed for any linux arch?
  - From: Franz Sirl
- Re: is sysdep-cancel.h needed for any linux arch?
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: is sysdep-cancel.h needed for any linux arch?
  - From: Franz Sirl

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]