This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: is it a bug of /glibc/sysdeps/arm/atomicity.h ?

> > let us consider the following scenario. Suppose there are three thread
> > pathes. 
> > Init:   *p = 0
> > T1 compare_and_swap(p, 0, 1) ; 
> > T2 compare_and_swap(p,0,1); 
> > T3 compare_and_swap(p,1,2);
> 
> Yes, that function is not actually atomic.  If you search the mailing
> list archives for gcc@gcc.gnu.org you'll find several possible fixes;
> no one's done any of them.

Can you get away with a light-weight syscall?

c.
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]