This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Adding missing symbols to the ISO-10646 charmap?
- From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere at hungry dot com>
- To: libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 16 Apr 2003 21:04:11 +0200
- Subject: Re: Adding missing symbols to the ISO-10646 charmap?
- References: <E195WYN-0000eY-00@minerva> <3E9C6ABB.7040306@redhat.com>
- Reply-by: Tue, 1 Jan 1801 04:37:40 +1000
[Ulrich Drepper]
> This file need not be extended.
OK. I reported this into Debian BTS.
> It is not possible to create a locale with this encoding. The file
> is mainly a left-over from the old days when characters had these
> names and the file served the purpose of documenting the names to
> get them unique.
Isn't this charset the closest thing glibc have to UTF-16? Why is it
impossible to create a locale using this encoding?