This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 02:39:44AM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: > HJ, > I am able to build glibc cvs (without the base patch) using a > stock debian binutils 2.14.90.0.1 (without the bfd-base patch). > The resulting glibc passes make check fine (and vismain.out in > particular). So it seems to me that we may need binutils cvs > for these two patches to work. Could you roll a test binutils > release from current binutils cvs? I'll test that tomorrow > using both of the patches again to see if the vismain.out test > still fails. Thanks in advance. Ooops. Here is the new symbol version patch. Please try this one. H.J.
Attachment:
libc-base.patch
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |