This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

static binaries and NSS


Hi,

I get more and more complains from ISVs, who linked their binaries
static against glibc, that the binaries stop working with a glibc
update. The reason for linking the binaries static is always, that
they think in this way they are independend of the installed glibc.


I think it is time that we add a linker warning to getpwnam and
friends, that static linking and using this functions, which calls
NSS, is a bad idea. Or should we go one step further and remove
this functions from the static libc like Solaris did?

Comments?

  Thorsten
-- 
Thorsten Kukuk       http://www.suse.de/~kukuk/        kukuk@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG        Deutschherrnstr. 15-19        D-90429 Nuernberg
--------------------------------------------------------------------    
Key fingerprint = A368 676B 5E1B 3E46 CFCE  2D97 F8FD 4E23 56C6 FB4B


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]