This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: static binaries and NSS

From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
To: Thorsten Kukuk <kukuk at suse dot de>
Cc: Bruce M Beach <brucemartinbeach at 21cn dot com>, libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 15:32:31 +0200
Subject: Re: static binaries and NSS
References: <20030610082350.GA8814@suse.de> <Pine.LNX.4.43.0306102235450.369-100000@systemx.zsu.edu.cn> <20030610132813.GA6202@suse.de>
Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>

On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 03:28:13PM +0200, Thorsten Kukuk wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, Bruce M Beach wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Thorsten Kukuk wrote:
> > 
> > > ... linking the binaries static ....
> > > ... (makes them) ... independent of the installed glibc....
> > >
> > 
> >    Hmmm. I also thought this was true
> 
> It is true, as long as you don't call functions which uses NSS.

And iconv.

	Jakub

References:
- static binaries and NSS
  - From: Thorsten Kukuk
- Re: static binaries and NSS
  - From: Bruce M Beach
- Re: static binaries and NSS
  - From: Thorsten Kukuk

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]