This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> writes: > On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 09:58:51AM +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote: >> >> As Gwenole pointed out, we do not use -fno-builtin for the math tests. >> >> Now the ceil test fails: >> testing long double (without inline functions) >> Failure: Test: ceil (0.25) == 1.0 >> Result: >> is: 0.00000000000000000000e+00 0x0.00000000000000000000p-3 >> should be: 1.00000000000000000000e+00 0x8.00000000000000000000p-3 >> difference: nan nan >> ulp : nan >> max.ulp : 0.0000 >> >> Test suite completed: >> 2525 test cases plus 2312 tests for exception flags executed. >> 1 errors occurred. >> >> Ok to commit? > > Shouldn't we use both -fno-builtin and -fbuiltin (ie. compile the testcases > twice)? People will use -fbuiltin in 99.9% of cases, so it is good if that > is tested. The drawback is that the math tests are CPU hogs both during > compile time and when running them. We compile them twice already - one with inline functions and one without. We can compile them another time if people think it's worth... I can send a patch if desired, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, 90429 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
Attachment:
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |