This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: bug in nextafter{f,} for x86


On Sat, Dec 06, Ulrich Drepper wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Richard Henderson wrote:
> 
> > [...]
> > does not in fact overflow on x86; it gets computed with
> > long double precision.
> 
> Should now be fixed in CVS.  Thanks,

Now it fails on i586, i686, ia64, s390x and x86-64 for me:

nextafterf+ did not overflow
nextafterf- did not overflow
nextafter+ did not overflow
nextafter- did not overflow

  Thorsten

-- 
Thorsten Kukuk       http://www.suse.de/~kukuk/        kukuk@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG        Deutschherrnstr. 15-19        D-90429 Nuernberg
--------------------------------------------------------------------    
Key fingerprint = A368 676B 5E1B 3E46 CFCE  2D97 F8FD 4E23 56C6 FB4B


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]