This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH] REPOST: ARM big-endian strlen() fix
- From: Dan Kegel <dank at kegel dot com>
- To: Roland McGrath <roland at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Krzysztof Halasa <khc at pm dot waw dot pl>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 05:59:39 -0700
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] REPOST: ARM big-endian strlen() fix
- References: <200406111016.i5BAGRCw015342@magilla.sf.frob.com>
Roland McGrath wrote:
Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> The attached patch fixes strlen() on big-endian ARM. Please apply.
It looks like that patch was originally posted by Andreas Schwab of SuSE
(see http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-glibc/2002-12/msg00056.html
for his patch and Changelog entry). The arm folks are after me to add
it to crosstool, and they say that it works. Probably a good bet.
I have put this in because it is trivial and clearly correct.
Thanks!
> But in
future, a patch submission should have a ChangeLog entry (I wrote one).
I linked to one (and said 'see [url] for his Changelog entry')
- sorry, I should have just copied it verbatim so it would have been easier to read.
And now, by far the best way to try to get something done is to file a
bugzilla report and attach your patch with ChangeLog entry there.
Then when you pester us about it, you can just refer to the bugzilla number.
Absolutely. I'm trying to train the linux-arm-toolchain@lists.arm.linux.org.uk
folks to always include the URL of the bug report and of the origin of
the patch when proposing patches. I'll make sure they know that a glibc
bugzilla number will help their patches get heard.
- Dan
--
My technical stuff: http://kegel.com
My politics: see http://www.misleader.org for examples of why I'm for regime change