This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH] REPOST: ARM big-endian strlen() fix
- From: Dan Kegel <dank at kegel dot com>
- To: Krzysztof Halasa <khc at pm dot waw dot pl>
- Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 14:43:47 -0700
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] REPOST: ARM big-endian strlen() fix
- References: <200406111016.i5BAGRCw015342@magilla.sf.frob.com>
Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com> writes:
Absolutely. I'm trying to train the
linux-arm-toolchain@lists.arm.linux.org.uk
folks to always include the URL of the bug report and of the origin of
the patch when proposing patches. I'll make sure they know that a glibc
bugzilla number will help their patches get heard.
Obviously, I'm not a member of linux-arm-toolchain list (at least yet,
I didn't know such list existed),
It was created just a couple days ago. (I would have thought the
crossgcc mailing list was good enough, but it doesn't hurt to have
an arm-specific toolchain list.)
> didn't know that a preferred way to
submit patches is bugzilla (asked here, no one responded),
glibc only started using Bugzilla a couple months ago, it's not surprising
the word hasn't really gotten out yet.
> and origin of
this particular patch is me, spotted the (quite trivial) bug while
building binutils, gcc and glibc for ixp425.
Right, it just happens to be nearly identical to an earlier posted patch.
I guess the only thing you did wrong was forget the Changelog entry.
Thanks for posting your patch, hope to see you on the linux-arm-toolchain
list!
- Dan
--
My technical stuff: http://kegel.com
My politics: see http://www.misleader.org for examples of why I'm for regime change