This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: getopt with gcc -ansi

From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
To: Paul Eggert <eggert at CS dot UCLA dot EDU>
Cc: libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com,Susukita Ryutaro <susukita at postman dot riken dot go dot jp>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 18:27:59 +0200
Subject: Re: getopt with gcc -ansi
References: <200408110549.OAA01233@mailman.riken.go.jp><jevffqhzzx.fsf@sykes.suse.de> <87n011sokz.fsf@penguin.cs.ucla.edu>

Paul Eggert <eggert@CS.UCLA.EDU> writes:

> Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> writes:
>
>> sleep is allowed everywhere <unistd.h> is allowed, but not getopt.
>
> But in POSIX 1003.1-2004, getopt and sleep are both required functions
> on the same footing; neither is an XSI extension, for example.
> Perhaps this wasn't true in older POSIX revisions, but it's true now.
> The "-ansi" flag should affect only the C standard level, not the
> POSIX revision level, no?

The -ansi flag provides C89, not POSIX.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

References:
- Re: getopt with gcc -ansi
  - From: Susukita Ryutaro
- Re: getopt with gcc -ansi
  - From: Andreas Schwab
- Re: getopt with gcc -ansi
  - From: Paul Eggert

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]