This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: PATCH: Spell exp2l correctly
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Roland McGrath <roland at redhat dot com>
- Cc: libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 11:01:27 -0800
- Subject: Re: PATCH: Spell exp2l correctly
- Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
- References: <200503281851.j2SIpTkW025988@magilla.sf.frob.com>
Roland McGrath wrote:
Hmm, we need to figure out what configurations (if any) were using the old
bogus definition before. Those haven't had exp2l in the GLIBC_2.1 version
set heretofore. For new applications that link against exp2l, we want that
to hit a new version set if the existing GLIBC_2.1 version set doesn't
contain exp2l.
I'm afraid I'm not knowledgeable enough to help with that; I don't
understand well enough all the ways in which GLIBC has been built and
deployed. The exp2l function is listed in libm.abilist, but the (bogus)
expl2 does not appear.
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com
(916) 791-8304