This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: strong aliases for data do not work properly in shared libs

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>
To: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 18:15:06 -0400
Subject: Re: strong aliases for data do not work properly in shared libs
Geoman: IS A RETARD
References: <200604131129.46260.vapier@gentoo.org> <200604131200.04083.vapier@gentoo.org> <20060413182201.GA23429@lucon.org>

On Thursday 13 April 2006 14:22, H. J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 12:00:04PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > the difference in func addresses is expected as each address refers to a
> > unique PLT entry and both PLT entries refer back to the proper symbol
> >
> > what i'm looking at here is the FAIL in prog-dynamic-lib with strong data
>
> It is because of copy relocation. On ia64, I got

indeed ... testing on some misc Gentoo ports and i see strong data fail on 
amd64/arm/x86, but work on ia64/ppc/ppc64
-mike

References:
- strong aliases for data do not work properly in shared libs
  - From: Mike Frysinger
- Re: strong aliases for data do not work properly in shared libs
  - From: Mike Frysinger
- Re: strong aliases for data do not work properly in shared libs
  - From: H. J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]