This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [NETLINK]: Schedule removal of old macros exported to userspace
- From: Stefan Rompf <stefan at loplof dot de>
- To: Thomas Graf <tgraf at suug dot ch>
- Cc: David Miller <davem at davemloft dot net>, drow at false dot org, dwmw2 at infradead dot org, joseph at codesourcery dot com, netdev at vger dot kernel dot org, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org, akpm at osdl dot org, linux-kernel at vger dot kernel dot org
- Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 15:58:01 +0100 (MET)
- Subject: Re: [NETLINK]: Schedule removal of old macros exported to userspace
- References: <20061208.134752.131916271.davem@davemloft.net> <200612091249.39302.stefan@loplof.de> <20061209125533.GO8693@postel.suug.ch>
Am Samstag, 9. Dezember 2006 13:55 schrieb Thomas Graf:
> Please calm down a bit. I didn't claim that glibc should be linking to
> libnl. glibc is obviously a special case which can simply copy the existing
> macros into some internal compat header just like any other application
> that doesn't wish to use any of the libraries available.
But when even glibc needs internal compat headers to compile with the second
kernel version that provides userspace headers, what is the long-term - even
mid-term - perspective of make headers_install then?
Stefan