This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: attribute (cleanup) vs. _Unwind_Resume

From: Roland McGrath <roland at redhat dot com>
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
Cc: Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge at gnu dot org>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 17:14:40 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: __attribute__ (__cleanup__) vs. _Unwind_Resume
References: <20090420072022.GA6878@fencepost.gnu.org><20090420183157.C42CBFC3C7@magilla.sf.frob.com><49ECE185.1000808@redhat.com>

> Roland McGrath wrote:
> > libc should be linked against libgcc_s.so on Hurd as it is on Linux.
> 
> On Linux libc isn't linked against libgcc_s.

Oh, my mistake.  Whatever we're doing for this, it ought to match.

References:
- __attribute__ (__cleanup__) vs. _Unwind_Resume
  - From: Thomas Schwinge
- Re: __attribute__ (__cleanup__) vs. _Unwind_Resume
  - From: Roland McGrath
- Re: __attribute__ (__cleanup__) vs. _Unwind_Resume
  - From: Ulrich Drepper

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: __attribute__ (__cleanup__) vs. _Unwind_Resume

Re: attribute (cleanup) vs. _Unwind_Resume