This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: attribute (cleanup) vs. _Unwind_Resume

From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
To: Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge at gnu dot org>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland at frob dot com>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 23:17:41 -0700
Subject: Re: __attribute__ (__cleanup__) vs. _Unwind_Resume
References: <20090420072022.GA6878@fencepost.gnu.org> <49ECCCFE.6010202@redhat.com> <20090421104809.GD23964@fencepost.gnu.org> <20090426105550.GI23964@fencepost.gnu.org>

You can move the file to sysdeps/gnu. If you provide a patch which is also tested with x86 and x86-64 Linux. But no further changes at this time.

--
â Ulrich Drepper â Red Hat, Inc. â 444 Castro St â Mountain View, CA â

Follow-Ups:
- Re: __attribute__ (__cleanup__) vs. _Unwind_Resume
  - From: Thomas Schwinge

References:
- __attribute__ (__cleanup__) vs. _Unwind_Resume
  - From: Thomas Schwinge
- Re: __attribute__ (__cleanup__) vs. _Unwind_Resume
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: __attribute__ (__cleanup__) vs. _Unwind_Resume
  - From: Thomas Schwinge
- Re: __attribute__ (__cleanup__) vs. _Unwind_Resume
  - From: Thomas Schwinge

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: __attribute__ (__cleanup__) vs. _Unwind_Resume