This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: glibc git tags

From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at linux-m68k dot org>
To: Roland McGrath <roland at redhat dot com>
Cc: Jim Meyering <jim at meyering dot net>, libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 23:26:58 +0200
Subject: Re: glibc git tags
References: <20090522222716.DD98FFC35D@magilla.sf.frob.com><873aawe036.fsf@meyering.net> <m2k540qd11.fsf@igel.home><20090529205644.CC14DFC2BD@magilla.sf.frob.com>

Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com> writes:

>> Here is the list of tags that are broken, together with the commit they
>> are supposed to point to:
>
> Sigh.  Does everyone concur that this list is complete and correct?

Note that I didn't bother to check the snapshot tags (which IMHO could
be deleted without loss of information).

> Now I am suspicious of all the cvs conversion stuff.

Don't blame the cvs conversion.  The repository was already pretty much
f***ed up to begin with (too many invalid direct repository
manipulations).

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

Follow-Ups:
- Re: glibc git tags
  - From: Jim Meyering

References:
- glibc git tags
  - From: Roland McGrath
- Re: glibc git tags
  - From: Jim Meyering
- Re: glibc git tags
  - From: Andreas Schwab
- Re: glibc git tags
  - From: Roland McGrath

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]