This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Determine libgcc_s version

From: Roland McGrath <roland at redhat dot com>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab at linux-m68k dot org>
Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 10:23:24 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Determine libgcc_s version
References: <m2my4pc01h.fsf@igel.home><20090921035841.8726613F35@magilla.sf.frob.com><m3my4obo2l.fsf@hase.home>

> See <http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4457#c3> for Uli's
> position.

That comment is unambiguous that getting LIBGCC_S defined is right.
It's not clear about automagic selection vs maintaining shlib-versions.


Thanks,
Roland

References:
- [PATCH] Determine libgcc_s version
  - From: Andreas Schwab
- Re: [PATCH] Determine libgcc_s version
  - From: Roland McGrath
- Re: [PATCH] Determine libgcc_s version
  - From: Andreas Schwab

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]