This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: How should STB_GNU_UNIQUE binding interact with RTLD_LOCAL ?

From: Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov at google dot com>
To: Roland McGrath <roland at hack dot frob dot com>
Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org, Cary Coutant <ccoutant at google dot com>, Ollie Wild <aaw at google dot com>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 13:04:32 -0700
Subject: Re: How should STB_GNU_UNIQUE binding interact with RTLD_LOCAL ?
References: <CALoOobP=XHQapArOd2RfQ7N6-XeB3WnFiGn-=o1ZDv1g-o_mCg@mail.gmail.com><20111025233056.7B1272C0C4@topped-with-meat.com>

On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com> wrote:
> AIUI, this is the fundamental purpose of STB_GNU_UNIQUE.

Thanks.

For what it's worth, we've decided that we simply can not live with
the current STB_GNU_UNIQUE behavior (and we do think it was
ill-conceived).

We are going to turn it off via a linker switch:
http://cygwin.com/ml/binutils/2011-10/msg00276.html

-- 
Paul Pluzhnikov

Follow-Ups:
- Re: How should STB_GNU_UNIQUE binding interact with RTLD_LOCAL ?
  - From: Roland McGrath

References:
- How should STB_GNU_UNIQUE binding interact with RTLD_LOCAL ?
  - From: Paul Pluzhnikov
- Re: How should STB_GNU_UNIQUE binding interact with RTLD_LOCAL ?
  - From: Roland McGrath

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]