This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH v2 0/10] Tilera (and Linux asm-generic) support for glibc
- From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos_odonell at mentor dot com>
- To: Roland McGrath <roland at hack dot frob dot com>
- Cc: Carlos O'Donell <carlos_odonell at mentor dot com>, Chris Metcalf<cmetcalf at tilera dot com>, Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>,<libc-ports at sourceware dot org>, <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, Arnd Bergmann<arnd at arndb dot de>, Linas Vepstas <linas at codeaurora dot org>, Guan Xuetao<gxt at mprc dot pku dot edu dot cn>, Jonas Bonn <jonas at southpole dot se>, Chen Liqin<liqin dot chen at gmail dot com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:21:55 -0500
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/10] Tilera (and Linux asm-generic) support for glibc
- References: <201111100054.pAA0sf6u025585@farm-0002.internal.tilera.com> <201111092314.34545.vapier@gentoo.org> <4EBB5285.1000808@tilera.com> <20111111181012.BB7752C0F8@topped-with-meat.com> <4EBD6AD6.805@mentor.com> <20111111190641.C37902C0F9@topped-with-meat.com>
On 11/11/2011 2:06 PM, Roland McGrath wrote:
>> The instructions as written do not lack meaning or sense, but it does
>> appear that they are inaccurate with respect to your ideals on the topic.
>
> I didn't say "meaningless" or "nonsensical", I said "stupid", didn't I? ;-)
Potayto, potahto. :-)
>> Personally I like the use of a repeating prefix coupled with a meaningful
>> subject line e.g. [PATCH 9/10] NPTL update: <Meaningful subject>.
>
> I think that is fine, though I don't especially see the appeal.
> The title of the group is what 0/n messages are for.
I added a note about using an optional repeating prefix.
I look forward to the next big patch set we get... say next decade?
Cheers,
Carlos.
--
Carlos O'Donell
Mentor Graphics / CodeSourcery
carlos@codesourcery.com
+1 (613) 963 1026