This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Fixed size of thread stacks in the nptl pthread implementation

From: Roland McGrath <roland at hack dot frob dot com>
To: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at redhat dot com>
Cc: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at systemhalted dot org>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org, Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 09:48:43 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Fixed size of thread stacks in the nptl pthread implementation
References: <20120203100831.GB26546@spoyarek.pnq.redhat.com><20120204034830.GA30944@spoyarek.redhat.com><CADZpyiw84-Z6OUwm8Kt240T4wwxXN69qMsyNYLYZSoJkh_0tUw@mail.gmail.com><20120206101229.GA11119@spoyarek.pnq.redhat.com>

I don't see why automatic growing behavior is a good or safe idea at all.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fixed size of thread stacks in the nptl pthread implementation
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Fixed size of thread stacks in the nptl pthread implementation
  - From: Carlos O'Donell

References:
- Fixed size of thread stacks in the nptl pthread implementation
  - From: Siddhesh Poyarekar
- Re: Fixed size of thread stacks in the nptl pthread implementation
  - From: Siddhesh Poyarekar
- Re: Fixed size of thread stacks in the nptl pthread implementation
  - From: Carlos O'Donell
- Re: Fixed size of thread stacks in the nptl pthread implementation
  - From: Siddhesh Poyarekar

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]