This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: The state of glibc libm


On 03/14/2012 08:30 AM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:

(b) Where functions do make attempts at being correctly rounded
(especially the IBM Accurate Mathematical Library functions), they tend to
be sufficiently slow that the slowness attracts bug reports.  Again, this
would likely be addressed by new implementations that use careful error
bounds and information about worst cases to reduce the cost of being
correctly rounding.

I'm not sure that the complaints are about worst cases. More probably software implementation vs hardware implementation in the average case. But a new software implementation (better in average) could help.
The complaints I typically see are about worst case performance. I occasionally see requests for better performance with the potential loss of accuracy.

jeff


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]