This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: struct siginfo vs. siginfo_t
- From: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf at tilera dot com>
- To: Nix <nix at esperi dot org dot uk>
- Cc: Thomas Schwinge <thomas at codesourcery dot com>, <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:21:49 -0400
- Subject: Re: struct siginfo vs. siginfo_t
- References: <20120226181752.1175.qmail@sourceware.org> <87zkbhkipp.fsf@schwinge.name> <87r4wt4xmp.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix>
On 3/15/2012 12:50 PM, Nix wrote:
> On 15 Mar 2012, Thomas Schwinge said:
>
>> I wonder -- if GCC
>> breaks, how much software out in the wild is going to break once this
>> glibc change ripples through?
> A bit of quick grepping through a biggish heap of source trees
> (including KDE 3 and 4 and GNOME 2, but not GNOME 3) suggests only GDB
> and strace (on Tile only, so perhaps irrelevant) are likely to be broken
> by this.
We owe the strace folks an update anyway, so I'll fix the 'struct siginfo'
there as part of it.
--
Chris Metcalf, Tilera Corp.
http://www.tilera.com