This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH: optimized expf for x86_32

From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at gmail dot com>
To: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot com>
Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 09:03:27 -0400
Subject: Re: PATCH: optimized expf for x86_32
References: <CAHjhQ91VCwyF0ByhLa1hfhKGP5TmSWxJ=qYpVdzYSqxCSY5oTw@mail.gmail.com><CAMe9rOpzh8n721MJKKrtqH3JLU1o2AnEyiRoyAE0x-WazdERUg@mail.gmail.com><CAMe9rOp_9a1GzCj4Y4_WecSTeoEU0yUtRrABo6BzjzoXJdsRMQ@mail.gmail.com><CAOPLpQcqsoLZ+itWP70B6B96J+g-U5EOfRNwFrWtvKWDCe7VcA@mail.gmail.com><CAHjhQ93dhcV4N1pRFkA5RBrYtYHvVV3-Zb=4rZbz59Z+9apZ9A@mail.gmail.com> <4F7D8A53.9040704@suse.com>

On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 08:04, Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.com> wrote:
> I wonder whether this shouldn't be sysdeps/i386/i686/fpu/multiarch - this is
> at least in agreement what we do with sparc and x86-64.

Yes.  The fallback needs the FPU.  All math should be in FPU.

References:
- PATCH: optimized expf for x86_32
  - From: Dmitrieva Liubov
- Re: PATCH: optimized expf for x86_32
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: PATCH: optimized expf for x86_32
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: PATCH: optimized expf for x86_32
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: PATCH: optimized expf for x86_32
  - From: Dmitrieva Liubov
- Re: PATCH: optimized expf for x86_32
  - From: Andreas Jaeger

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]