This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] BZ #14059 - HAS_FMA4 check needs to also check for AVX

From: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot com>
To: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Cc: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at systemhalted dot org>,Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 16:05:20 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH] BZ #14059 - HAS_FMA4 check needs to also check for AVX
References: <hopqaf6pz3.fsf@byrd.suse.de> <201205141012.12317.aj@suse.com> <CADZpyiywXEOEKB1KWG3SoSFkomE=ndGBUXqrbdhNSvrW_PkUZQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Monday, May 14, 2012 15:36:37 Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>
> OK, so the next step is:
> 
> * Fix the mutual recursion issue.
> * Fix the |= vs. = issue with AVX_Usable.

And also with FMA4.

> * Move the FMA4 test up into the AVX test we already have.
> * Roll the extra test into the testsuite.
> 
> I'll do this, retest on an system with and and without AVX and report
> back.

Please add the test case also to i386/i686/multiarch - the same way init-
arch.c is handled. I can send a patch if you need it.

Thanks for untangling these,
Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
  SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
   GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg)
    GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126

References:
- [PATCH] BZ #14059 - HAS_FMA4 check needs to also check for AVX
  - From: Andreas Jaeger
- Re: [PATCH] BZ #14059 - HAS_FMA4 check needs to also check for AVX
  - From: Andreas Jaeger
- Re: [PATCH] BZ #14059 - HAS_FMA4 check needs to also check for AVX
  - From: Carlos O'Donell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]