This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Joseph S. Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote: > On Mon, 14 May 2012, Roland McGrath wrote: > >> I'm not sure there is really any need to leave behind those new comments in >> the top-level shlib-versions file. ?I think we will eventually move to >> having all the per-machine lines in sysdeps files, so x86_64 is not really >> special in this regard. > > While I like the aim of moving entirely to sysdeps files for this, the > move for x86_64 has affected the gnu/lib-names.h contents for x86 - I've > filed <http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14112> for this. > Any ideas for how the gnu/lib-names.h build for x86 can get information > from shlib-versions files in x86_64 sysdeps directories (and likewise for > all the other biarch/triarch cases as they move to sysdeps directories)? > Here is a patch. I added a special lib-names.awk for x86/x86-64 to handle it properly for x32, ia32 and x86-64. Any comments? Thanks. -- H.J.
Attachment:
0001-Properly-handle-lib-names-for-x86-64-and-x32.patch
Description: Binary data
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |