This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 01/17] mktime: merge HAVE_CONFIG_H change from gnulib

From: Paul Eggert <eggert at cs dot ucla dot edu>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 09:57:44 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/17] mktime: merge HAVE_CONFIG_H change from gnulib
References: <4F631655.50702@cs.ucla.edu> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1203181347170.10325@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <CAMe9rOq4ENv8EknCAkyAMj+AmJdOAJk9HbxTi1OiRrXsRMZvmQ@mail.gmail.com> <4FBAAC27.8070600@cs.ucla.edu> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1205212104190.12491@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <CAMe9rOrufTm5Ae80L1hNOX0yVXgCEH-er469J51qZHqchAS-Ew@mail.gmail.com>

On 05/22/2012 06:19 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> I checked in 7 approved patches.

Thanks for doing that.  I'll submit the remaining patches shortly.
Although I haven't had time to test them properly with glibc on x32
(or any other platform for that matter), the resulting source code
 after applying the patches has worked for months on many platforms in
gnulib-based applications like coreutils, and the patch series
should handle your x32 problems.

References:
- Re: [PATCH 01/17] mktime: merge HAVE_CONFIG_H change from gnulib
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: [PATCH 01/17] mktime: merge HAVE_CONFIG_H change from gnulib
  - From: Paul Eggert
- Re: [PATCH 01/17] mktime: merge HAVE_CONFIG_H change from gnulib
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: [PATCH 01/17] mktime: merge HAVE_CONFIG_H change from gnulib
  - From: H.J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]